My
writing teacher warned me this would happen. One rejection letter after another
piled on shelves and shoved into filing cabinets. There's enough paper to cover
my office walls--and ceiling and floor and some of the hallway.
Well,
that's one solution.
There has
to be more to the rejection letter than dust collector and object of scorn.
Most writers will say that the best way to handle rejection letters is to read
them, file them, and send the rejected piece off to someone else as soon as
possible. It's not bad advice, but it's not good enough.
Take a
long, hard look at that letter. Has the editor tossed you a crumb of hope?
Given you even the slightest chance to hang on to your confidence and
self-respect?
Yes, it's
a form letter--the same terse, soulless letter they send to every writer who
doesn't make the grade--but what else? Amongst all those stiffly typed words,
is anything other than the signature handwritten? Quite likely. Editors like to
add quick notes to writers who show some promise. If you can decipher the
scrawl--editors are as inscrutable as doctors when it comes to penmanship--pay
attention to the words. If you're lucky, the editor will compliment one or more
aspects of your story--then tell you exactly where he or she thinks you went wrong.
Take the
comments seriously, but don't take them to heart--unless they all start saying
the same things. If nine out of ten editors say your ending falls flat, it
probably does. Don't sulk. Don't get angry. Fire up your computer (or uncap you
pen) and get back to the business of writing. Tuck your original version
away--just in case--and start making changes. Use the suggestions you like.
Dream up a few of your own. Throw away the rest. After all, it's still your
story. You can only make so many changes based on outside commentary before it
becomes someone else's story.
Thicken
your skin by joining a writers' workshop (either online or in person). Everyone
submits their work for critique. It won't take long for you to realize that a
single story can generate critiques that run the gamut from "this is
absolutely wonderful" to "better luck next time."
Whether
you're hearing from fellow writers or detached editors, don't take the comments
personally. Except in rare cases, critiques are aimed at the story, not at the
writer.
Finally,
accept the fact that--for most of us--the rejections will far outweigh any
successes. Writing is a subjective art form. Standards of quality shift from
person to person and from moment to moment.
Remain as
true as possible to your original vision. Somewhere amidst all those
publications is an editor who sees life as you do--or at least appreciates the
way you present your case.
===========
Betty Dobson is an
award-winning writer of short fiction, essays and poetry. She also writes
newspaper and magazine articles but is still waiting for those awards to
materialize. In the meantime, she continues to run InkSpotter Publishing, which is always open to submissions and queries.