If you haven't seen my other posts on tropes, a trope is a
common plot device, character type, writing element, etc. I believe that many tropes are so common
because they're popular, fun, and good—except that they've become so overused
that they've lost some of their goodness.
These should be treated carefully and creatively. Other tropes are simply a result of laziness
or convenience. These should often be
avoided.
Whatever your opinion of tropes, they're fun to discuss.
This month's trope: "Conveniently
an Orphan."
(named by TVtropes.org)
Advantages of making
your characters orphans:
-They can conveniently take off on adventures without any
family to tie them down or make them look selfish and irresponsible for doing
so.
-They don't have to constantly be interrupting the adventure
and action in order to go home and visit their family or watch their niece's
ballet recital.
-They don't have a support network already, so they'll need
to depend more on themselves and their friends—perhaps new and unlikely
friends.
-It forces young characters to solve difficult problems that
normally their parents would solve.
-You have fewer characters to write.
-It provides a ready-made tragic backstory. ("My mother
was murdered so now I'm a workaholic homicide detective who can't get close to
people" or "I'm a delightful, sweet-tempered child who, for some
strange reason, nobody has ever loved…until now.")
-It can provide motivation in the vein of, "You killed
my father. Prepare to die."
-The bad guy can't kidnap your character's family members in
order to force him to do his will—which would, let's face it, be the logical
thing for many bad guys to do. But your
character has no family, so…plot problem solved.
-Orphanhood tends to go well with various "Chosen
One" tropes.
-If the character doesn't even know who his parents were,
you have various twist possibilities ("Luke, I am your Father!" or
"Oh, I'm actually not a milkmaid but a princess!").
-Readers LIKE orphan characters, perhaps because we identify
with the loneliness typified best by orphans, perhaps because we like
underdogs, perhaps because it's interesting to think about what we would be
like without the influence of our parents and families. Whatever the reason, orphans in literature
are popular.
Disadvantages of
making your characters orphans:
-If you're not careful, it can easily come off as a convenient
cliché.
-It can come of as lazy.
-It can come off as unrealistic. True orphans who grow up in horrible
Dickens-like orphanages or in the dark side of the foster care system aren't
always the sweet, innocent, well-adjusted people they are in old books. Even true orphans do often have other
family: adoptive parents, biological
uncles, cousins, grandparents, etc, and these would still provide kidnapping
fodder for bad guys. Some of this family
might also be people your character could—and would—phone in a crisis. So be careful not to write as if your
characters grew up in a vacuum, even if both their parents have been dead for
many years.
Where this trope
appears:
The "Conveniently an Orphan" trope is VERY common
in fantasy and science fiction, especially if you count characters who still
have one parent alive: Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, Star Wars,
The Belgariad, the Discworld novels,
The Black Cauldron, half the fairy tales you can think of (though they may
have one parent), The Wizard of Oz (though
she has adopted parents she loves), The Hero and the Crown (still has a
father), the Hunger Games (still has
a mother).
Many other more mainstream books and classic works of
literature also have orphans or characters with only one live parent. Victor Hugo, Charles Dickens, Jane Austen, Louisa
May Alcott, George Elliot, and various Brontes certainly partook. James Bond is an orphan. It's also common for the detectives in
mysteries (especially TV crime dramas).
You'll see it sometimes in romances and women's lit and other genres.
And, of course, it's essential for sweet orphan stories like
Anne of Green Gables (and
Montgomery's Emily of New Moon), Annie,
The Secret Garden and A Little Princess, Little
Lord Fauntleroy (only one dead parent), Jane
Eyre, A Series of Unfortunate Events, Heidi (though with a loving
grandfather), The Boxcar Children,
Pollyanna, etc. These are all great books, but you'll need a
pretty original slant or some particularly compelling characters if you're
going to do it now.
For my previous trope posts, click below:
Tropes in Literature #1:
Mr.
Exposition and Captain Obvious
Tropes in Literature #2:
This
is My Story
Melinda Brasher is back in the United States
after spending two more years in the Czech Republic among castles and forests
and hiking trails. Her most recent sales
are to Ember and Double
Feature. Visit her online at http://www.melindabrasher.com.
3 comments:
Melinda, I've never thought about making characters orphans and didn't realize they're in so many science fiction and fantasy stories. Helpful list of advantages and disadvantages on using them. Something to think about!
Joseph Campbell made it obvious that there is no such thing as a new plot structure. It is certainly valuable for anyone interested in literature to follow your trope series, Melinda, and to read his books!
Melinda, your ideas are always so fresh, they're a joy to read. I will keep this information in mind. It is a great help. Thank you.
Post a Comment